This is not a complaint, just a question:
Is it not possible to protect a solid-state power-controlling device from over-current destruction?
The reason I ask is that a family member just accidentally destroyed an Insteon plug-in dimmer module by plugging a vacuum cleaner into the dimmer’s extension cord to its Christmas lights. No biggie - I just bought a replacement and he learned a lesson.
Am I right in guessing that a twenty-cent thermal fuse would react too slowly to protect a triac and that’s why these dimmer modules are not fused? And that there’s no other practical fusible device which might protect them? Because … replacing a fuse might be considerably cheaper than buying a new dimmer … 😉
P.S. yes, I know I might have avoided the issue by plugging the dimmer into the extension cord rather than vice-versa, but for several reasons in this instance that just wasn’t doable. Also of course “If it hurts when you do that, don’t do that”. 🤣
Is it not possible to protect a solid-state power-controlling device from over-current destruction?
The reason I ask is that a family member just accidentally destroyed an Insteon plug-in dimmer module by plugging a vacuum cleaner into the dimmer’s extension cord to its Christmas lights. No biggie - I just bought a replacement and he learned a lesson.
Am I right in guessing that a twenty-cent thermal fuse would react too slowly to protect a triac and that’s why these dimmer modules are not fused? And that there’s no other practical fusible device which might protect them? Because … replacing a fuse might be considerably cheaper than buying a new dimmer … 😉
P.S. yes, I know I might have avoided the issue by plugging the dimmer into the extension cord rather than vice-versa, but for several reasons in this instance that just wasn’t doable. Also of course “If it hurts when you do that, don’t do that”. 🤣
Comment